Why Most Objection Handling Training is Absolute Rubbish (And What Actually Works)

Related Articles:

• Managing Difficult Conversations
• Emotional Intelligence for Managers

Look, I'm going to be brutally honest here - and this might ruffle a few feathers. After watching countless sales teams fumble through objection handling for the past seventeen years, I reckon about 89% of the training out there is teaching people to be argumentative robots rather than actual human beings.

The problem isn't that people don't know how to handle objections. The problem is they're being taught to "overcome" them like they're in some sort of verbal wrestling match.

The McDonald's Drive-Through Syndrome

You know what I call it when someone hits me with a textbook objection response? The McDonald's drive-through syndrome. "Would you like fries with that?" level of authenticity. And frankly, it's insulting to both the customer and the salesperson.

I was working with a team in Adelaide last month - proper established business, been around for decades. Their top performer was this bloke named Craig who'd never done a day of formal sales training in his life. When customers said "It's too expensive," Craig would lean back in his chair and say something like, "Fair dinkum? What's making you feel that way?"

Not "Let me show you the value proposition." Not "Have you considered the long-term ROI?" Just genuine curiosity about what's actually going on in the customer's head.

Craig consistently outsold everyone else by about 40%. The formally trained team members? They sounded like they were reading from a script written by someone who'd never actually spoken to a customer.

What They Don't Teach You About Objections

Here's the thing nobody wants to admit in those glossy training manuals: most objections aren't really objections. They're questions in disguise. Or they're the customer trying to maintain some control in a conversation where they feel pressured.

"I need to think about it" doesn't mean they need to think about it. It means they don't trust you yet, or they're not convinced you understand their actual problem, or they're worried about looking stupid if they make the wrong decision.

But instead of addressing the real issue, we train people to launch into some spiel about "urgency" and "limited time offers." Brilliant way to confirm their suspicions that you're just another pushy salesperson.

The best objection handling I've ever witnessed happened during a software demo in Melbourne. The prospect said, "This seems complicated." The salesperson - absolute legend - responded with, "You're right, it does look that way on the surface. What specific part is worrying you most?"

Ten minutes later, they'd identified that the prospect's real concern was training their elderly receptionist on new technology. Problem solved. Deal closed. No "overcoming" required.

The Listening Paradox

And here's where it gets interesting - the more you try to handle objections, the more objections you create. It's like trying to hold water in your hands. The tighter you squeeze, the more it slips through your fingers.

I've seen sales managers drilling their teams on objection responses like they're studying for the bloody HSC. Forty-seven different ways to respond to "It's too expensive." Twenty-three variations on "We're happy with our current supplier." It's mental.

Meanwhile, companies like Atlassian have built empires by actually listening to what customers are saying and responding accordingly. Not a coincidence, is it?

The irony is that when you stop trying to handle objections and start trying to understand them, they often disappear entirely. Or they transform into something you can actually work with. "It's too expensive" might become "We're not sure this will solve our cash flow problem," which is a completely different conversation.

What Actually Works (Warning: Requires Being Human)

Right, so what should you be teaching your team instead of those robotic response patterns?

First up: pause. When someone raises an objection, take a breath. Count to three. Let them finish completely. Most people interrupt at the first sign of resistance, which immediately puts the customer on the defensive.

Second: get curious, not defensive. "That's interesting, tell me more about that" works better than any scripted response I've ever seen. People want to be heard, not argued with.

Third: acknowledge their concern before you address it. "I can understand why you'd feel that way" isn't agreeing with them - it's recognising that their concern is valid from their perspective. Big difference.

And here's the bit that'll make some traditional sales trainers lose their minds: sometimes the customer is right. Sometimes your product isn't a good fit. Sometimes it is too expensive for what they need. The sooner you acknowledge this, the sooner you can either find a solution that works or part ways amicably.

I once watched a rep in Brisbane talk himself out of a $50K deal because he couldn't accept that the customer genuinely wasn't ready to buy. Six months later, when they were ready, guess who they called first? The guy who'd listened to them and respected their timeline.

The Emotional Intelligence Component

Now, here's where it gets a bit more sophisticated. Different personality types object differently, and they need different approaches.

Your analytical types - engineers, accountants, IT directors - they'll want data and evidence. Don't give them the emotional sell when they're asking for specifics.

Your relationship-focused buyers need to know you understand their team dynamics and internal politics. They're not just buying a product; they're buying a change that affects real people.

And your results-driven executives? They want to know how this moves the needle on their KPIs. Don't bore them with features when they're thinking about outcomes.

Most difficult conversation training focuses on conflict resolution, but objection handling is really about conversation navigation. Different skill set entirely.

The Technology Trap

Speaking of different approaches, can we please stop pretending that objection handling hasn't changed in the digital age? Your customers have already done three hours of research before they even talk to you. They know your pricing, your competitors, and probably your company's Glassdoor reviews.

The old "Let me educate you about our superior features" approach died somewhere around 2015, yet I still see training programs teaching it like it's gospel.

Today's customers don't need information - they need interpretation. They need someone who can help them make sense of all the conflicting advice they've found online. They need a guide, not a walking brochure.

I was running a workshop in Perth recently where one participant said, "But if I don't overcome their objections, how do I close the deal?"

Wrong question entirely. The right question is: "How do I help them make the decision that's right for them?" Sometimes that means buying from you. Sometimes it doesn't. But when you approach it that way, your close rates actually improve because you're building trust instead of applying pressure.

The Authenticity Factor

Here's what really gets me fired up about traditional objection handling training: it turns decent people into caricatures of themselves. I've seen naturally empathetic, intelligent professionals reduced to spouting meaningless corporate speak because that's what they've been taught "works."

You want to know what works? Being yourself. Being genuinely interested in solving problems. Being honest about limitations. Being willing to say "I don't know, but I'll find out."

Customers can smell insincerity from a mile away. And in our hyperconnected world, word travels fast about salespeople who come across as fake or pushy.

The companies that get this right - think Canva with their customer-first approach, or Xero with their focus on actually understanding small business challenges - they're not training their teams to "handle" objections. They're training them to have authentic conversations about real business problems.

What This Means for Your Training Program

So if you're designing objection handling training for your team, here's my advice: throw out the script books. Stop drilling responses. Start practicing curiosity.

Role-play scenarios where the goal isn't to overcome objections but to understand them. Teach people to ask better questions. Help them develop genuine empathy for customer concerns.

And for the love of all that's holy, teach them that it's okay to lose deals. In fact, losing the wrong deals faster is often more profitable than winning them slowly.

The best salespeople I know aren't objection handlers - they're objection preventers. They're so good at understanding customer needs upfront that most objections never surface. And when they do, they're genuine concerns that can be addressed collaboratively rather than obstacles to be overcome.

Because here's the truth nobody talks about: customers don't actually want to give you objections. They want to buy from someone they trust to solve their problem. Everything else is just noise.

Make sense? Good. Now stop teaching your team to be argument machines and start helping them become trusted advisors. Your customers - and your revenue - will thank you for it.